AdLibbing Blog

June 23, 2011

Minority Children & Media: A Racial Discrepancy

Written by Carter Gibson | 4:15 am
Minority Children & Media: A Racial Discrepancy
It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that youth spend more time using media than any other activity in their day.  And for some reason I had always assumed that kids consume media targeted towards them pretty evenly regardless of their race and ethnicity. This 2011 Northwestern University study did a very succinct job of telling me I was totally wrong.
Turns out minorities consume an average of four and half more hours of media a day than their white counterparts (most of it in television). “Four and half HOURS?!”  I thought. I wish I could find time to watch America’s Got Talent let alone an unabridged DVD of Lord of the Rings!
Now, admittedly, this study would require hundreds of pages from many other studies to provide a comprehensive analysis on this sensitive topic. There’s no way I can possibly try to tackle all the reasons why this racial discrepancy exists, but I can offer you the study’s highlights:
Minority youth consume four and a half more hours of media daily than White youth even after adjustment for socio-economic status
The smallest discrepancy is for video games, with minority youth only playing half an hour more per day than White youth
84% of Black youth, 77% of Asian youth, and 64% of White youth have a TV in their bedroom respectively
Reading print is the only medium without statistically significant differences by race
Asian youth spend nearly three times the amount of time on a computer than White or Black youth at 3hrs per day
Multitasking media also does not differ significantly based on race
Despite Black youth watching the most television, Asian youth and Hispanic youth receive the most media exposure per day at 13hrs. White youth are exposed to 8.5hrs daily
“So what?” you might be asking yourself. Well, as media outlets and content continues to grow at an exponential rate towards critical mass, youth eagerly absorb all the information they can. Understanding their habits can yield both an opportunity for positive exposure and an increase in media effectiveness as well as an opportunity to limit the negative effects of too much consumption. For instance, The Ad Council could certainly glean something from this study for the “Let’s Move!” campaign.
Bottom line? This study gives context to and paints a broader picture of an often hard to motivate demographic.
The full report, agenda, attendees can be downloaded at http://cmhd.northwestern.edu/?page_id=9

tvwatch

It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that youth spend more time using media than any other activity in their day.  And for some reason I had always assumed that kids consume media targeted towards them pretty evenly regardless of their race and ethnicity. This 2011 Northwestern University study did a very succinct job of telling me I was totally wrong.

Turns out minorities consume an average of four and half more hours of media a day than their white counterparts (most of it in television). “Four and half HOURS?!”  I thought. I wish I could find time to watch America’s Got Talent let alone an unabridged DVD of Lord of the Rings!

Now, admittedly, this study would require hundreds of pages from many other studies to provide a comprehensive analysis on this sensitive topic. There’s no way I can possibly try to tackle all the reasons why this racial discrepancy exists, but I can offer you the study’s highlights:

Minority youth consume four and a half more hours of media daily than White youth even after adjustment for socio-economic status

The smallest discrepancy is for video games, with minority youth only playing half an hour more per day than White youth

84% of Black youth, 77% of Asian youth, and 64% of White youth have a TV in their bedroom respectively

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

June 30, 2010

Stats Ain’t Nothin’ But a Number

Written by Rowena Tse | 4:31 pm

One of the most common tricks in the marketing handbook is the use of statistics. 4 out of 5 dentists recommend Trident. 1 in 5 New Yorkers rely on the food bank to eat. 64% of houseguests notice odors in your home.

When used appropriately in communications, statistics can give consumers a piece of truth to grab onto, a compelling reason to buy Trident gum, donate to the Food Bank for New York City, or paint their homes with new odor-eliminating Dutch Boy paint. For PSAs, statistics can provide relevance and proximity to an issue, convey its urgency and shock viewers into paying attention.

Take our Hunger Prevention campaign, for instance. Back in the summer of 2008, during our initial creative development, we found that many people in the U.S. simply did not think of hunger as a problem that existed here in America. They saw it as a developing world issue; one that affected poor people in faraway places. We needed messaging that could drive home the size and scope of the domestic hunger issue, and get people to take action.

Our solution? An alarming, stops-you-in-your-tracks, statistic. 1 in 8 Americans struggles with hunger.

We anchored every piece of our communications with the 1 in 8 fact—in TV, radio, print, outdoor, web banners, website, talking points and press releases. Heck, we even named the campaign “1 in 8.” It was all working swimmingly until, well … the stat changed.

Construction1in8size199 (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

May 11, 2010

Strengthening Relationships in an Erratic, Emerging Media Environment

Written by John Boal | 4:12 pm

At the recent music and interactive South by Southwest festival in Austin, Texas, Kurt Daradics, 34, co-founder of a start-up company, reflected how much he had enjoyed meeting people he had befriended online from budding tech communities throughout the country.

It was cool finally meeting them in the flesh,” he commented.  Duh?

If there were ever a line that captured the impersonal disconnect that permeates throughout the new media world of digital and social media, then Daradics said it perfectly, albeit in an ironic way.

We’ve entered the age of a Media Mosh Pit where traditional national and local media are trying to embrace all the new digital, place-based and social media that are encroaching on their sacred sales turf in ways that are confounding senior management since it’s competition they haven’t confronted face-to-face at industry conferences.

That’s why right below media management, our contacts are dancing on pins wearing more hats than ever in 2010, especially with double-digit revenue losses in 2009.

Even though they’re selling more ads this year, their roles are changing by the week as corporate management bears down on the bottom line.  This naturally creates more stress on our contacts who are generally in non-revenue generating positions and who are worried about their positions.

Yet, as this new media butterfly emerges from these exigent pressures, it becomes almost mandatory for those of us seeking donated — yikes, unsold inventory — to be ever more creative in our approaches to strengthen some jittery relationships.

Interestingly, the elastic boomerang taking place within the communications triangle of email, traditional and social media, is a flow-back to very simple human connections and communications.  We’re seeing this in a number of new ad campaigns such as “Cisco:  The Human Network;” “Chevron:  The Human Energy Company” and “Amtrak:  Be Human.  Explore Nature.”

This reaction corresponds directly to one of the Megatrends articulated by John Naisbitt in his 1982 landmark book of the same name.

“High tech/high touch is a formula I use to describe the way we have responded to technology,” he wrote.  “What happens is that whenever new technology is introduced into society, there must be a counterbalancing human response — that is, high touch, or the technology is rejected.  The more high tech, the more high touch.”

Herein lies the secret to building and strengthening “high touch” relationships with the media.  We must generate more creative “human” engagement.

Here are some examples:

1.     Rapid-fire 60-second Responses

When a media contact emails – or if it’s a rare phone call — try to answer within 60 seconds.  Especially if you can’t provide the answer he or she is seeking.  The perception of an instant response is greater than the actual answer.  It builds an understated, long-term reliability, as the media contact knows when they can’t get an answer anywhere else, they’ll hear from you. 

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Filed under: Media

Tags: ,

Older Posts »